[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
A recent court decision (ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2024:7175) has brought clarity to the eligibility requirements for the 30% ruling in the Netherlands. This tax benefit, designed to reimburse extraterritorial expenses for employees hired from abroad, hinges on specific criteria. The case at hand focused on whether the employee could be classified as “hired from abroad.[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
De werknemer, oorspronkelijk afkomstig uit India, verhuisde in 2019 naar Nederland om hoger onderwijs te volgen. Na zijn studie in september 2020 te hebben afgerond, verbleef hij in het land op basis van een zoekjaarvisum voor hoogopgeleide migranten. Hij werkte voor verschillende werkgevers in Nederland voordat hij eind november 2021 een arbeidsovereenkomst voor bepaalde tijd tekende. De centrale vraag in de zaak was of de werknemer ten tijde van de ondertekening van de overeenkomst als \"uit het buitenland afkomstig\" kon worden beschouwd.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
The court ruled that the employee did not qualify as “hired from abroad.” The employee had been living in the Netherlands since 2019 and was registered in the Basisregistratie Personen (BRP) from October 2019. His family joined him in June 2020, and they established a stable life in the Netherlands. Additionally, the employee had not returned to India since his arrival and had been working for multiple employers in the Netherlands before the employment contract with his current employer was finalized. The court considered these factors and concluded that the employee was not recruited from another country when he signed the contract.<\/p>\n
This case underscores the complexity of the “hired from abroad” requirement for the 30% ruling, especially when the employee is already living in the Netherlands. Determining whether an employee qualifies for this tax benefit can be challenging without professional guidance. If you are facing a similar situation, TACS Solutions can help you with the 30% ruling applications, ensuring compliance with all the necessary requirements.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row custom_padding_last_edited=”on|desktop” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#3e8596″ custom_padding=”5rem|5rem|5rem|5rem|false|false” custom_padding_tablet=”5rem|5rem|5rem|5rem|false|false” custom_padding_phone=”2rem|2rem|2rem|2rem|false|false” animation_style=”fade” border_radii=”on|15px|15px|15px|15px” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” header_2_font_size=”3rem” header_2_font_size_tablet=”3rem” header_2_font_size_phone=”2rem” header_2_font_size_last_edited=”on|phone” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”@ET-DC@eyJkeW5hbWljIjp0cnVlLCJjb250ZW50IjoicG9zdF9saW5rX3VybF9wYWdlIiwic2V0dGluZ3MiOnsicG9zdF9pZCI6Ijg3In19@” button_text=”Contact us” button_alignment=”center” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _dynamic_attributes=”button_url” _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_color=”#3e8596″ button_bg_color=”#ffffff” custom_padding=”15px||15px||false|false” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_button][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Background A recent court decision (ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2024:7175) has brought clarity to the eligibility requirements for the 30% ruling in the Netherlands. This tax benefit, designed to reimburse extraterritorial expenses for employees hired from abroad, hinges on specific criteria. The case at hand focused on whether the employee could be classified as “hired from abroad.Key facts of […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":690,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":870,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions\/870"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/690"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}