[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
In a notable decision, the Dutch court addressed complex issues surrounding dual residency, international taxation and the prevention of double taxation. This case (ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2024:2867) sheds light on how courts approach the determination of tax residency and the application of tax treaties, particularly in situations involving individuals with ties to multiple countries.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
De belastingplichtige in dit geval had een dubbele nationaliteit en leefde enigszins verdeeld tussen Koeweit en Nederland. Na meer dan tien jaar in Nederland te hebben gewoond en gewerkt, verhuisde hij in 2005 naar Koeweit, waar hij tot 2014 bleef. Hoewel hij terugkeerde naar Nederland en zijn gezin daar registreerde, bleef hij in Koeweit werken en onderhield hij zowel professionele als persoonlijke banden met beide landen.<\/p>\n
In 2017, the individual worked as a sales representative for a Kuwaiti company, spending considerable time in multiple countries, including Kuwait, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates and the Netherlands. Given this global footprint, the tax authorities faced the challenge of determining the taxpayer’s residency for tax purposes and whether he was entitled to relief from double taxation on income earned abroad.<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” hover_enabled=”0″ global_colors_info=”{}” sticky_enabled=”0″]<\/p>\n
The central question in this case was whether the taxpayer should be considered a resident of the Netherlands in 2017. The court ruled affirmatively, noting that the individual had a strong and sustainable connection with the Netherlands. He maintained a home in the country, lived there with his family and had worked in the Netherlands in the past. This reinforced his status as a resident taxpayer under Dutch law.<\/p>\n
Once his residency was established, the focus shifted to the issue of double taxation on his income earned in Kuwait. Under the tax treaty between the Netherlands and Kuwait, residents of one country are entitled to relief from double taxation on income earned in the other. The court acknowledged that the Netherlands must provide relief for the income earned by the taxpayer during his time working in Kuwait.[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
Een belangrijke uitdaging deed zich voor bij het vaststellen van het exacte bedrag aan inkomsten dat de belastingplichtige in Koeweit verdiende, aangezien hij geen duidelijke documentatie had verstrekt. Daarom paste de rechtbank een tijdgebaseerde methode toe om de juiste belastingvermindering te berekenen. Het aantal dagen dat de belastingplichtige in Koeweit had gewerkt \u2013 107 dagen \u2013 werd gebruikt als basis voor het bepalen van de belastingaftrek.<\/p>\n
After factoring in weekend days and vacation days in the Netherlands, the court calculated a larger tax deduction than originally granted by the tax authorities. Importantly, the court also clarified that no tax relief was applicable for income earned in other countries beyond Kuwait, as those countries did not have tax rights under Dutch law.[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
This ruling provides valuable insights for individuals and businesses navigating the complexities of international tax law. It underscores the importance of clearly documenting workdays and income across different countries, particularly when claiming tax relief under international tax treaties. It also highlights how personal and economic connections to a country can influence tax residency, even for individuals who spend substantial time abroad.[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][et_pb_row custom_padding_last_edited=”on|desktop” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” background_color=”#3e8596″ custom_padding=”5rem|5rem|5rem|5rem|false|false” custom_padding_tablet=”5rem|5rem|5rem|5rem|false|false” custom_padding_phone=”2rem|2rem|2rem|2rem|false|false” animation_style=”fade” border_radii=”on|15px|15px|15px|15px” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” global_colors_info=”{}”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _module_preset=”default” header_2_font_size=”3rem” header_2_font_size_tablet=”3rem” header_2_font_size_phone=”2rem” header_2_font_size_last_edited=”on|phone” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”]<\/p>\n
[\/et_pb_text][et_pb_button button_url=”@ET-DC@eyJkeW5hbWljIjp0cnVlLCJjb250ZW50IjoicG9zdF9saW5rX3VybF9wYWdlIiwic2V0dGluZ3MiOnsicG9zdF9pZCI6Ijg3In19@” button_text=”Contact us” button_alignment=”center” _builder_version=”4.27.4″ _dynamic_attributes=”button_url” _module_preset=”default” custom_button=”on” button_text_color=”#3e8596″ button_bg_color=”#ffffff” custom_padding=”15px||15px||false|false” locked=”off” global_colors_info=”{}”][\/et_pb_button][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In a notable decision, the Dutch court addressed complex issues surrounding dual residency, international taxation and the prevention of double taxation. This case (ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2024:2867) sheds light on how courts approach the determination of tax residency and the application of tax treaties, particularly in situations involving individuals with ties to multiple countries.A life between two worlds […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":491,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-91","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":885,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91\/revisions\/885"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tacssolutions.com\/nl\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}